We’ve all been down the familiar rabbit hole of wanting that timeless dive-watch silhouette made famous by the Rolex Submariner, but knowing our budget (and daily-wear reality) won’t justify the real thing. We’re also aware of the frustrations if you try and go the homage route: the “great deal” that turned out to feel flimsy on wrist, the “nice look” that fell apart after a pool session, the “perfect size” that wore like a brick, and more. After nearly a decade of hands-on reviews and personal experience, we’ve learned there are Submariner homages that avoid all of that and still deliver the look and feel you want.
So we’ve created this list of watches that respect the iconic dive watch’s lineage without feeling cheap or hollow. They honor its design and wrist feel, but they aren’t lazy copies or bargain-bin specials that fall apart after a few months of wrist time. We have hands-on experience with all of these. We’ve worn them, sized and resized them, swapped straps, analyzed the lume, felt the bezel action, and we’re writing from that lived-in place of “does this work in real life?” You’ll also find links below to each timepiece’s full hands-on review if you want additional specs, more photos, and long-term thoughts.
Invicta Pro Diver
| Price Range: | $60-$80 |
| Water Resistance: | 200m |
| Case Dimensions: | 40mm (diameter) x 48mm (lug-to-lug) x 14mm (thickness) |
| Lug Width: | 20mm |
| Movement: | NH35 (Mechanical) |
The Invicta Pro Diver 8926OB has long been the go-to “why not?” watch for anyone curious about Submariner-style design on a realistic budget. It doesn’t pretend to be something it’s not, and that’s why it works. The 40mm case nails the proportions that make the Sub silhouette so wearable, and the machining is surprisingly crisp for a watch that sells for under $100. During testing, our review team appreciated how balanced it felt on the wrist right out of the box: no awkward sizing dance or bulky overhang. The brushed lugs against polished case sides create a clean contrast that feels intentional, not overworked. According to our testing experience, the only sore spot in the case is the oversized logo engraved on the case flank, which adds noise to an otherwise simple design.
In use, the Pro Diver feels familiar in the best way. The aluminium bezel doesn’t feel cheap, even if there’s a touch of wiggle between clicks, and the tactile feedback makes everyday timing tasks oddly satisfying. The applied markers and polished hands catch the light nicely, though the lume is inconsistent and fades faster than we’d like. Still, it’s usable for real-world situations such as timing your coffee, your commute, or even a casual swim. The mineral crystal and cyclops magnifier are functional, and the screw-down crown provides enough security for light water use. We wore it through one of those Florida downpours that soaks you, and it kept ticking without a hint of fogging or failure.
Inside, the Seiko NH35 movement makes the watch shine at this price point. Reliable, serviceable, and smooth to wind, it delivers performance that’s tough to beat under $100. The bracelet isn’t perfect. Hollow end links and a stiff flip-lock clasp remind you where corners were cut, but the taper and finishing make it more comfortable and solid than expected. Overall, the Invicta Pro Diver is a straightforward, surprisingly well-built Submariner homage that proves you don’t need luxury pricing to enjoy timeless dive-watch style.
Pros
- Well-executed 40mm Submariner-style case with solid machining and finishing.
- Dependable Seiko NH35 automatic movement with hacking and manual wind.
- Comfortable bracelet with balanced taper and clean finishing.
- Excellent value for money; looks and feels far above its price.
Cons
- The engraved Invicta logo on the case flank feels out of place.
- The lume application is weak and inconsistent.
- Hollow end links and stiff clasp reduce perceived quality.
- The bezel has slight play between clicks.
San Martin SN004 Mil-Sub
| Price Range: | $167 – $200 |
| Water Resistance: | 200m |
| Case Dimensions: | 38mm (diameter) x 46mm (lug-to-lug) x 13mm (thickness) |
| Lug Width: | 20mm |
| Movement: | NH35 Seiko Automatic |
The San Martin SN004 Mil-Sub proves that affordable homages don’t have to feel cheap. Drawing inspiration from the legendary Rolex 5513 MilSub, this 38mm diver offers the proportions we wish the real Submariner had. The compact size and balanced weight give it a natural wrist feel that instantly won over our review team. The brushing across the case and lugs is clean, with a polished bevel that catches the light enough to hint at refinement. It’s not flawless, since the brushing is a bit shallow and picks up hairline marks easily. On the wrist, it feels substantial for its size, weighing 140g on the bracelet, and offers a reassuring heft. The domed sapphire crystal adds visual warmth and a touch of distortion near the edge.
The bezel execution is another standout. While testing, its gear-tooth design felt deliberate and rugged, giving the watch a sturdier personality than most coin-edge alternatives. The 120-click action is smooth, tight, and satisfying, something few watches under $200 can claim. Paired with a ceramic insert that’s engraved and filled with crisp markings, the whole bezel setup feels like something from a far more expensive diver. The dial itself is rich and glossy, with applied indices filled generously with BGW9 blue lume that glows evenly across the markers. The polished surrounds complement the lacquered finish beautifully; however, the flat handset lacks some depth and can appear slightly recessed in certain lighting conditions.
Inside beats the Seiko NH35, the reliable workhorse movement that never feels out of place in a microbrand diver. Our sample ran between +7 and +9 seconds per day, and that’s acceptable for this price range. The bracelet is solidly built, with brushed links, screw pins for easy sizing, and a milled clasp that feels sturdy, if a bit sharp on the edges. The sizing range might be snug for larger wrists, but it fits most average wearers comfortably. While we eventually preferred it on a NATO strap to emphasize the military roots, the stock bracelet still exceeded expectations. Overall, the SN004 Mil-Sub doesn’t mimic a classic; it captures its usability and confidence. For collectors tired of flimsy budget divers, this is one of the best value-driven MilSub homages out there.
Pros
- Excellent bezel action and ceramic insert quality for the price.
- Dependable Seiko NH35 movement with solid accuracy.
- The presence of a sapphire crystal at such a low price point.
- High-quality finishing and build that outperforms expectations under $200.
Cons
- Brushing is shallow and prone to light scratches.
- The bracelet edges are sharp and can pull on hair.
- The flat handset lacks dimension and reduces legibility in certain lighting conditions.
Steinhart Ocean One Vintage Red

| Price: | $436 |
| Water Resistance: | 300m |
| Case Dimensions: | 42mm (diameter) x 50mm (lug-to-lug) x 13mm (thickness) |
| Lug Width: | 22mm oyster style that tapers down to 20mm |
| Movement: | ETA 2824-2 Elaboré |
The Steinhart Ocean One Vintage Red draws its inspiration from the classic Sea-Dweller, rather than the Submariner directly; however, the brand’s overall DNA clearly nods to that famous Rolex lineage. What makes this model stand out is how it channels that late-’60s professional diver look without sliding into copycat territory. The sharp, clean edges of the 42mm case give it a crisp, modern feel, while the overall build captures that rugged Sea-Dweller character. Our team found the proportions comfortable despite the larger diameter, thanks to a relatively slim 13mm profile that slips neatly under a cuff. The bezel and crown are both easy to grip and satisfying to use, offering that tactile precision you expect from a solid diver. The only complaint arose from the crown’s sharp edges, which can dig in slightly during prolonged wear.
The dial is where the Ocean One Vintage Red separates itself from typical homages. The flat gray surface shifts between muted silver and deep charcoal depending on the light, giving it far more depth than expected. The “Old Radium” lume adds warmth and a touch of nostalgia, glowing a steady green that’s functional if not blinding. The red text on the dial fades in and out depending on the angle, which gives it a subtle, lived-in charm rather than shouting for attention. In daily wear, it feels confident but understated.
Powering the watch is the reliable ETA 2824-2 Elaboré movement, which ran a few seconds fast per day during our testing but stayed consistent overall. The standard oyster-style bracelet is sturdy, though we wish it tapered more (to 18mm at least) for comfort. It lacks a dive extension, but for most of us desk divers, that’s not a dealbreaker. The watch also pairs beautifully with a vintage leather strap or NATO, giving it that versatile, broken-in feel collectors appreciate. For around $430, the Ocean One Vintage Red delivers a genuine vintage look and solid construction that make it a strong choice for enthusiasts chasing Sea-Dweller charm without the Rolex price tag.
Pros
- Strong case finishing and tactile bezel feel at an accessible price.
- Versatile gray dial with rich color variation and vintage warmth.
- Dependable ETA 2824-2 Elaboré movement with solid accuracy.
- Works well on bracelet, leather, or NATO straps.
Cons
- Crown edges can feel sharp on the wrist.
- Bracelet taper is minimal and lacks dive extension.
- Red text can fade visually under certain lighting conditions.
WMT Royal Marine Diver
| Price: | $550 |
| Water Resistance: | 100m |
| Case Dimensions: | 39.5mm (diameter) x 47mm (lug-to-lug) x 14.8mm (thickness) |
| Lug Width: | 20mm oyster style that tapers down to 16mm |
| Movement: | Seiko NH35 |
The WMT Royal Marine Diver collection targets two of the most sought-after vintage Rolex designs: the military-issued 5517 MilSub and the COMEX-branded 5512 Submariner, and successfully captures their character without feeling like a costume piece. Both versions, the Royal Navy Aged Edition and the Subdiver, share the same 39.5mm case with thoughtful finishing that feels far more refined than the price would suggest. Our review team found the case work crisp and balanced, with brushed and polished transitions that echo the tool-watch roots of the originals. The friction-fit bezel has a smooth, deliberate action, and the aged “ghost” insert on the Subdiver looks natural. You get 100m of water resistance, which is more than enough for swimming or an accidental dunk, and the tall acrylic crystal adds real charm to the vintage look.
Both dials lean heavily into that nostalgic, military-inspired feel. The Royal Navy’s matte gray-black surface, paired with sword hands and the small circle-T emblem, nails the Ministry of Defence aesthetic, while the Subdiver’s bolder “block” text channels COMEX-era grit. The aged lume isn’t great for night visibility. It glows faintly and fades quickly. The slightly mismatched tone between hands and markers adds realism, not sloppiness. In person, the watches look and feel like pieces with history, not replicas fresh from a catalog. During testing, we found them to be wearable and versatile; they feel just as at home on a NATO strap for weekend wear as they do on a bracelet in an office setting.
Both models are powered by the Seiko NH35, a proven automatic movement that provides reliability and easy servicing. Accuracy hovered around +2 seconds per day on our samples, which is stellar for a watch in this range. The Subdiver’s Oyster-style bracelet, modeled after the old Rolex 93150, stood out for its comfort and sturdiness, with screw links and a satisfying taper that made sizing simple. But the Royal Navy comes on a WMT-branded Phoenix clone that’s so short that we ended up swapping it for a CWC NATO strap to achieve a spot-on look.
Taken together, the Royal Marine Diver line feels like WMT at its best: focused, faithful, and built for enthusiasts who want that vintage tool-watch soul without babying it.
Pros
- Authentic vintage aesthetic capturing both MilSub and COMEX influences.
- Comfortable 39.5mm case with solid finishing and acrylic crystal charm.
- Reliable Seiko NH35 movement with excellent timekeeping.
- The bracelet version offers a strong build and easy sizing, along with versatile strap options.
Cons
- Lume performance is weak and fades quickly.
- No screw-down crown or fixed-lug option for complete military accuracy.
- Slight tone variation between dial and hands under bright light.
Glycine Combat Sub
| Price Range: | $400 – $600 |
| Water Resistance: | 200m |
| Case Dimensions: | 42.2mm (diameter) x 50mm (lug-to-lug) x 10.5mm (thickness) |
| Lug Width: | 22mm |
| Movement: | ETA 2824 Automatic |
The Glycine Combat Sub takes the classic dive watch blueprint and refines it, removing the bulk that accompanies it. At just 10.5mm thick, it’s one of the slimmest 200m divers around, and that thinness makes a real difference in daily wear. During testing, we found that it slides easily under a cuff, doesn’t snag on anything, and feels more refined than most watches in its class. The 42mm case might sound large, but the sharply down-swept lugs help it hug the wrist comfortably, even for those with mid-sized wrists. The smooth, straight-sided profile gives it a sleek presence, and the drilled lugs make strap changes painless. On the wrist, it carries the spirit of a Submariner without the flash.
The matte gray dial adds to that understated look. It’s crisp, clear, and designed for legibility, thanks to a flat sapphire crystal that remains nearly invisible from any angle. The 24-hour inner scale is a subtle but practical touch, and the color-matched date window shows Glycine’s attention to detail. Lume is strong enough to last through the night without overpowering the dial in daylight. The bezel action feels deliberate and tight, with zero backplay and a small raised nub at 12 o’clock that makes finding your place by touch effortless. The coin edge is narrow but grippy, though its stiffness might challenge gloved hands.
Powering the Combat Sub is Glycine’s GL224 automatic movement, a rebranded ETA 2824 that has long proven itself reliable. Our device maintained steady time at around +6 seconds per day after a light calibration, which speaks to the movement’s durability. The bracelet feels solid and secure, tapering slightly from 22mm to 20mm; however, we wish it had a bit more taper for added elegance. The milled clasp and solid end links add confidence, even if the pin-and-collar setup is finicky to size. For many of us, the real appeal here is versatility: it’s a capable diver that doesn’t scream “dive watch.” The Glycine Combat Sub strikes that rare balance where the Rolex Sub’s quality, comfort, and design restraint all converge, offering something that feels classic yet uniquely its own.
Pros
- Exceptionally thin case for a 200m automatic diver.
- Down-swept lugs and flat crystal improve comfort and legibility.
- Reliable Swiss GL224 (ETA 2824) movement with solid accuracy.
Cons
- The bezel is stiff and can be tricky to turn with wet hands.
- Pin-and-collar bracelet links make sizing tedious.
- Limited taper on the bracelet reduces wrist elegance.
Please let us know your thoughts on these picks below and if there are any other pieces out there you think we should review and consider including.
Co-Founder and Senior Editor
Kaz has been collecting watches since 2015, but he’s been fascinated by product design, the Collector’s psychology, and brand marketing his whole life. While sharing the same strong fondness for all things horologically-affordable as Mike (his TBWS partner in crime), Kaz’s collection niche is also focused on vintage Soviet watches as well as watches that feature a unique, but well-designed quirk or visual hook.
How about Revue Thommen’s homage submariner offering? Although it’s rrp is more expensive than those you’ve listed, it’s actual selling price us in the $500-600 range. I’ve not pulled the trigger and gotten one yet, but I’d be interested to know what your take on it is.
Hi, J!
I’m actually not familiar with this brand, but I just looked them up and I’m clicking around on the site. If we’re able to potentially review one of these pieces in 2026 we’ll certainly consider it for inclusion in this piece.
Thank you,
-Kaz
Where do you find that watch at for 5-600 dollars? Went to their website and they’re going for 3k.
That kinda bumps it out of the “affordable” list.
Hi, William:
I’m actually seeing a lot of these Thommen pieces heavily discounted on retailers like Jomashop and Ashford in the $600 – $800 range, so that may be what they are referring to.
Best,
-Kaz
Baltany’s homage needs to be on the list
Hi, James:
Baltany is a new one to us but these do look pretty solid. I’ll discuss it internally with our editorial team to see if maybe we can try and review one of their pieces next year. If we do then we’ll certainly discuss whether it should be included in this list or not.
Best,
-Kaz
Invicta? You lost ALL credibility with that one. The biggest piece of junk in the world of watches. Unbelievable.
Hi, Bob:
Invicta is a controversial brand – I totally get it. And the brand itself doesn’t really do itself any favors with their marketing or the majority of their designs. But you can check out the full review we did of the Invicta Pro Diver if you’d like to see all of our reasoning for giving it a positive review. I actually delayed purchasing the Pro Diver for years because of the stigma of the brand. But I decided to try it out for myself and was pleasantly surprised. For the price, it wears well, features one of the most reliable automatic movements available, and employs really comfortable case dimensions. And it does all of that for under $100 (from online retailers, never pay full retail), which is something that we felt in our testing was truly something most brands couldn’t compete with. But I understand if the watch just isn’t your preferences – it’s all good!
Best,
-Kaz
I know the Invicta are easy to dismiss,but I purchased a Pro Diver over 12 years ago to use as my work watch. I have worn it daily over those 12 years working as a Chef I have put it through the wringer.I have also worn it scuba diving in the Keys and Virgin islands. I think I paid around $50 bucks for it originally.I be wearing it today when I go out to tackle my fall yard work.Perhaps I got the only diamond in the coal pile .
Hi, William:
This is honestly something I’ve heard from a lot of other Invicta Pro Diver owners as well. They bought it years ago and used it as their daily, putting it through the ringer and just using it as a workhorse. For the price, it’s hard to beat that in this category.
Best,
-Kaz
I agree I’ve wear mine everyday with no problems.
I have the same watch, have had it for 5 years , bought it for a work watch , had the battery
Changed once. Have also been diving in the keys with it on.
It still looks good, I get compliments all the time, and it still keeps perfect time ,
Agreed! I bought one to test it out. Was a problem movement. I sent it to have it fixed and was told can’t be fixed needs a new movement. I took it back for a refund. It was the mechanical, auto movement. Looked nice enough but not quality.
Now, you need to look at the pagani line of watches. They’re decent and worth more than the price. I’ve had 3 going on 4 yrs now with no issues. They’re all using the Seiko movements.
The fact Steinhart’s aging entry made this list over Thorns T023 I think is unfortunate. The Thorn may be a newer release but I think it is one of the best new takes on the vintage submariner dna.
Proportions are spot on for the vintage feel being 12.2mm even with a very proud domed sapphire crystal. 39mm case but with a 40mm bezel that slightly overhangs and with a proper lug to lug gives it a 4-5 digit sub feel on the wrist. It has a 4hz automatic movement (pt5000) ticking away and the bracelet is a gorgeous thin rivet style but still maintains a delicate 20mm -16mm taper to the thin stamped, press fit double signed clasp that is well built and perfectly captures the retro feel. It truly feels like a proper old oyster bracelet on the wrist.
I can agree with the choice of including Invicta because if nothing else, it is supremely accessible, but you do yourself and your readers a disservice if you ignore what Thorn and now Watchdives are doing in this space.
Hi, Brett:
I actually really appreciate this comment. Watchdives and Thorn are two brands we’ve actually heard really great things about within the watch community and directly from collectors we know personally. We’ve discussed it internally here on the editorial team and we’ve decided to prioritize Sub homages from these two brands for our 2026 review schedule. After we complete those reviews next year, they’ll be considered for inclusion in this piece.
Thank you so much for the thoughtful comment!
Best,
-Kaz
Just got a Watchdives in for review 🙂 Stay tuned.
Don’t sleep on a tried and true brand in this category- The TIMEX Deepwater. Just got one for a daily driver and I love it. Feels substantial and tight with classic good looks. I must not be the only fan, as these tend to sell out quickly. Check it out.
Hi, CVL:
You know, just when I think there wasn’t a part of horology that Timex didn’t totally nail, I forget about the Timex Deepwater collection haha. You’re absolutely right – there are some fantastic Submariner homages in the collection. I’m going to try and see if it’s possible for the editorial team and I to get one in for review soon so we can do a proper hands-on test with it.
Best,
-Kaz
We’ll be reviewing one very soon (:
Kaz,
Oceaneva may be another brand worth considering. They run frequent specials that put their watches at similar price points. Divers are tested at 1000m plus and come in lots of color variations.
Hi, Eric:
We’ve worked with Oceaneva before in the past for a brand feature on the site. But we haven’t done a full hands-on test with one of their Submariner homages, which is why we didn’t include them on this list. That’s a great point about the 1000m rating as that’s definitely an edge they have against other 200m and 300m divers.
Best,
-Kaz
Casio Duro is my go to. I’m honestly surprised it didn’t make it on this list.
Hi, Randy:
So it’s funny – we love the Casio Duro and my wife technically owns one. However, we have never completed a formal review of it (which we will be doing in 2026). That’s why it’s not featured here since we only call out watches on these pieces that we’ve actually tested hands-on for the site. But certainly keep an eye on this piece for a future update with the Duro.
Best,
-Kaz