I’ve spent more time than I care to admit hunting for a classically sized field watch that actually holds up in real-world use. Not “field-inspired.” Not “modern reinterpretation.” Just a simple, compact watch that checks the three basic boxes: military styling, solid water resistance, and a screw-down crown. You’d think that would be easy to find. It’s not. Until I found the Timex Expedition Field Post Solar 36mm during a recent recording of the Two Broke Watch Snobs podcast.
The Timex Expedition was always there
And really, it’s fitting that this watch comes from the Timex Expedition line. For a lot of us, that name means something special. It was probably one of the first watches we ever owned. Maybe a resin digital you wore to school, or a beat-up analog with INDIGLO you fished out of a junk drawer years later. The Expedition line has always been Timex doing what Timex does best: no-nonsense, everyday watches with just enough charm to feel like gear, not jewelry. They’re honest watches. Durable, affordable, and easy to find. The kind of thing that earns loyalty without ever demanding it. So when this Field Post Solar landed, it already came with a little built-in goodwill. And maybe that’s part of why it stuck.
Nothing else quite did it
The Seiko Alpinist is a beautiful watch, especially the updated 2025 models, which I still see myself owning someday. But for this specific itch I was trying to scratch, the Alpinist always felt a little too refined. Too polished. It’s got cathedral hands, gold-tone accents, and a case that leans more “mountain gentleman” than “no-frills field tool.” The Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical was closer to the mark (TBWS tested one a while back). I’ve got nothing but respect for what it brings to the table. But it didn’t check all the boxes for me. No screw-down crown, low water resistance, and the sizing felt just slightly off on my wrist. Still, part of me wonders if I gave it enough of a shot. Maybe it deserved a few more days in rotation.
I even dipped into the AliExpress underworld. Rdunae, Militado, all those homage-but-maybe-original field watches that almost get you there. Some had the specs. Some had the style. None had both. And even when they did, something always felt off. Case finishing that looked okay in the product shots but showed its edges in person. Crowns that claimed to screw down but felt like threading a stripped bolt. It was all too much work for a watch that still wouldn’t feel right.
Then this Timex snuck in
Enter the Timex Expedition Field Post Solar 36mm. A watch I probably scrolled past a dozen times before giving it a real look. I’m glad I did.
This one feels like it was built for people who’ve been asking for exactly this and gave up. The 36mm case wears lean and low, but it doesn’t feel dainty. It’s 12mm thick with a brushed, bead-blasted stainless finish that looks ready for scratches. Lug-to-lug, it sits compact at around 44mm, and the geometry keeps it centered and flat on the wrist. It disappears under sleeves, never feels top-heavy, and never once needed adjusting during the day. The crown threads in without drama. Not buttery smooth, but far from crunchy. It’s functional, which is all I was really asking for.
Straight from the spec sheet playbook
The dial leans classic too. Black with full Arabic numerals, no nonsense, no fluff. It follows the layout of the MIL-W-46374 military spec almost to the letter, the kind of field watch template that’s been issued, worn, and trusted for decades. It doesn’t try to modernize field watch design, and I respect that. Legibility is spot on, especially under the slightly domed sapphire crystal with AR, and there’s just a touch of distortion at the edge. Enough to keep it from feeling sterile. But the lume is bad. Technically it’s there, but even after a strong charge, it fades fast. After two minutes it’s a ghost, and in low light, you might as well be staring at a blank dial. On a watch this purpose-built, it feels like the one corner that was genuinely cut. And yeah, it’s hard not to think how perfect this would’ve been with Indiglo instead. That would’ve sealed it. I know that can’t be done but how cool would that be?!
Solar power, no hassle
Inside, you get a solar quartz movement with up to four months of power reserve. I never had to think about it once it was charged, and that’s the point. No winding. No resets. No ticking accuracy guilt trips. Just light plus time equals go. It’s an easy watch to trust, and that’s what a field watch should be. Setting the time is quick and clean. The crown action is solid, with just enough tactile snap to reassure me it’s locked in.
Strap swap required
Even the strap was better than expected. Soft, eco-friendly leather that broke in quicker than I thought it would. But it was a little thick for my taste, especially on a smaller case. I gave it a shot, then gave up and tossed it in the strap graveyard. These days, I’ve got it on a plain grey US-made MIL-Strap from ADPT Straps. No crazy contrast stitching, not too much texture. Just clean, minimal, and utilitarian. Exactly what I wanted the watch to feel like in the first place.
I’ve already worn it through a few rainy commutes and sink splashes without a second thought. It’s earned the seal. It’s also the one I grab when I don’t want to decide. Grocery run, early morning commute, rushed errand. I even had it on while wrestling with the dog to give her the nightly medicine dose. You know …. real man’s man stuff that requires a mil-spec style field watch.
A Timex worth keeping for the long haul
What I didn’t expect was how much relief this watch gave me. Relief that someone, Timex of all brands, finally put together a field watch that respects the original formula without cheapening the feel. It’s not over-designed or bloated, or posturing. It just works. And for $199, it works exactly as I want it to.
I don’t even need the specs I spent months obsessing over. I work a desk job. My version of field duty is digging under the couch for a dropped spring bar tool. But something in me still wants the screw-down crown. Still wants to know it could take a fall, a splash, a storm. Even if the only storm I’ll face is a morning coffee spill.
This Timex Expedition has earned a place in the core of my collection. Right there next to the Doxa, the IWC, and the Speedmaster. Not because it’s trying to be them. But because it isn’t. It’s honest. It’s useful. It showed up at exactly the right time. I didn’t expect a Timex to land here, but the fact that it has says everything I need to know about how much this one stuck.

Co-Founder & Senior Editor
Michael Peñate is an American writer, photographer, and podcaster based in Seattle, Washington. His work typically focuses on the passage of time and the tools we use to connect with that very journey. From aviation to music and travel, his interests span a multitude of disciplines that often intersect with the world of watches – and the obsessive culture behind collecting them.
Timex expedition, great looking watch but sadly no one at timex can think out of the box!! ITS MISSING THE MOST IMPORTANT FUNCTION!!!!!!
WHERE IS THE INDIGLO FUNCTION !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hi, Andrew:
Kaz here from TBWS. That’s actually a great call out. The Indiglo function from Timex is so cool and very useful. I used to have a Timex Chrono that had it. It would be great if they released a version of this size with the solar movement and indiglo. Let’s see what happens. Timex has actually gotten pretty good at reading the room on their releases and making the watch community pretty happy.
Best,
-Kaz
The perfect watch! Except the lume sucks and the strap is garbage….
Hi, Joe:
Kaz here from TBWS. Timex lume has honestly never been anything to write home about – so expectations there were going to be low. As far as the strap is concerned, Mike (who conducted this review) generally doesn’t enjoy wearing leather straps. From his testing notes he mentions the strap is actually pretty good quality but just maybe on the thicker side. But for someone that does enjoy leather straps, I’m sure they would appreciate the quality here given the testing notes that Mike has shared.
Best,
-Kaz
No!
Why does everyone write about these tiny watches. Why does that 36 mm watch look so huge on your wrist? How many times is that watchband folded over? Does no one review substantially sized gear? Sorry, not solely your fault, but pretty frustrated about all these tiny gadgets that I keep wasting my time reading about.
Hi, E.F.:
Kaz here from TBWS. If you like the 36mm version of this watch, Timex does make a larger version at 41mm. I think over the last few years the trend has certainly been skewed towards smaller timepieces. I think it’s mostly a reaction from how for many decades larger watches were in trend. It’s honestly a cycle that always goes back and forth. But from the perspective of someone preferring a larger watch, I totally understand how it’s frustrating seeing many smaller timepieces being reviewed. It’s also honestly a lesson for the Editorial Team and I here to make sure we expand and try to review watches of various sizes.
Thank you!
-Kaz
I know it’s not a Timex, but you should also look at the Casio Wave Ceptor Men’s Watch (WVA-M630B-3AJF). All of the above and a light to show see it in the dark. As well as WWVB reception for setting the time.
Thanks. I’ve always found those interesting but have been a little worries about how the reception/auto-time setting works. Would be worth getting one in for testing. We appreciate the recommendation.
I have the Timex TW2Y31700 41mm, which I think is fantastic and simple, as is the strap. It’s solar-powered, but not radio-controlled.
I had one of these and returned it – between the thick, stiff strap (which, at 18mm, wasn’t easily replaceable for me; everything else I own is 20mm), the low legibility (cream on gray), the case thickness (just a hair chunky for its width), the nonexistent lume, and the second hand being slightly misaligned on mine, the whole thing felt slightly off for me. I ended up with a Vaer S3, which is a little too bland (also, why 1/3-second ticks???), but felt slightly better proportioned overall. I keep seeing pictures of this watch and thinking I should try it again, and I have to remind myself that I actually didn’t like it on my wrist!
Hi, Mikko:
I mean that’s the reality of the situation sometimes with watches – nothing will ever really compare to how you feel wearing the watch in person. It’s always going to look top notch in studio photos and such. So it sucks that you had to return the watch due to it not really bringing you joy, but good for you for not trying to force yourself to like it. We read stories all the time about people who are a bit disappointed after their watch purchase but then they just keep the watch anyway even though it won’t bring them joy.
Best,
-Kaz